Visa Engine
GuidelinesPricingSign inGet started
Visa Engine
TermsPrivacyNot legal advice.
GuideEB-2-NIWWell Positioned to Advance the Endeavor
EB-2-NIW

Well Positioned to Advance the Endeavor

Dhanasar Prong 2 — education, skills, record of success, and plan

Official Definition

Matter of Dhanasar, 26 I&N Dec. 884 (AAO 2016), requires that the petitioner demonstrate they are well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor. USCIS considers factors including but not limited to: the individual’s education, skills, knowledge, and record of success in related or relevant efforts; any model or plan for future activities related to the proposed endeavor; any progress toward achieving the proposed endeavor; and the interest of potential customers, users, investors, or other relevant entities or individuals.

Prong 2 is forward-looking but must be grounded in credible past performance and a plausible path—not aspiration alone.

What Adjudicators Look For

Officers weigh whether the totality of the record shows you can actually execute the endeavor. A STEM Ph.D. or other advanced credentials may be relevant under January 2022 USCIS guidance but are not alone dispositive. Adjudicators look for concrete proof: publications, citations, patents, products shipped, patients enrolled (where applicable), code or datasets adopted, leadership roles, funding won, media coverage tied to technical contribution, and letters from people who know the work firsthand.

For entrepreneurs, evidence of founder role, capital raised, revenue, strategic partnerships, hiring, and technology milestones supports positioning. For clinicians or researchers, appointments, grants, trial leadership, and peer recognition matter.

Evidence Strength

Strong Evidence

    Weak Evidence

      Common RFE Triggers

      Common RFE Triggers

      • Prong 1 and Prong 2 misaligned: national importance claimed for one topic, résumé focused on another without bridging narrative.
      • Relying on employer title alone (e.g., “senior engineer”) without outcomes tied to the endeavor.
      • Student status with only coursework—insufficient independent research, employment, or entrepreneurial traction.
      • Confidentiality invoked for all specifics, leaving the record empty of verifiable facts.
      • Expert letters that repeat petitioner language without independent assessment.

      Tips

      Pro Tips

      • Create a one-page “positioning map”: skills → past wins → next milestones for the same endeavor.
      • Use before/after metrics where ethical and accurate (efficiency gains, error reduction, adoption growth).
      • For early-career petitioners, emphasize accelerated achievements, selective programs, and external validation—even if scale is modest.
      • Coordinate Prong 2 exhibits with EB-2 eligibility documents (degrees, experience) so the story feels unified.
      • Redact sensitively but leave enough non-secret detail for an officer to understand impact.

      Relevant Document Types

      CV, employment verification, publication and citation reports, patent office documents, grant award notices, media articles, conference acceptances, recommendation letters, customer or pilot agreements, pitch decks (summary slides + evidence), tax or revenue summaries where appropriate, licensure, and Other verifiable artifacts of progress.

      Previous

      Substantial Merit and National Importance

      Next

      On Balance, Waiver Benefits the United States

      Ready to check your evidence?

      Upload documents and get AI-powered analysis against this criterion.

      Create a case

      On this page

      • Official Definition
      • What Adjudicators Look For
      • Evidence Strength
      • Common RFE Triggers
      • Tips
      • Relevant Document Types